Previous Year Questions — CCSU Meerut
2016, 2019, 2022
Define Tort. Distinguish between Tort, Crime, and Breach of Contract.
2015, 2018, 2021, 2024
Explain Damnum Sine Injuria and Injuria Sine Damno with landmark cases.
2017, 2020, 2023, 2025
Discuss Rylands v. Fletcher rule. How did M.C. Mehta case modify it into Absolute Liability?
Definition & Nature of Tort
Salmond: "A tort is a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages, and which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or trust."
Limitation Act 1963 (Sec. 2(m)): A civil wrong which is not exclusively a breach of contract or trust.
Latin Root: Torquere = "to twist" — conduct that is twisted or crooked/unlawful.
Breach of Contract
Pre-fixed damages; consent-based duty
TORT
Unliquidated damages; duty by law
Breach of Trust
Equitable wrong; fiduciary duty
Essentials of a Tort
Wrongful Act/Omission
Did something prohibited OR failed to do a legal duty
Legal Damage (Injuria)
Infringement of a legally recognised right
Legal Remedy
Civil action for damages (Ubi jus ibi remedium)
Damnum Sine Injuria
Meaning: Damage/Loss (damnum) without legal injury (injuria). A person suffers financial or other loss, but no legal right is violated — so no action lies.
Principle
Exercising a lawful right may cause loss to another, but if no legal right is violated, no tort action lies. Competition in trade is the best example.
Example
Opening a rival shop and selling goods cheaper → neighbour loses profits →
no tort (no legal right violated).
Gloucester Grammar School Case (1410) — Court of Common Pleas
Facts: A rival school opened next to an established grammar school. The original school had to cut fees from 40 pence to 12 pence, suffering heavy loss.
Held: No action. Defendant had a lawful right to open a school. Financial loss without legal injury = Damnum sine injuria.
Chasemore v. Richards (1859) — House of Lords
Facts: Defendant dug a well on his own land, intercepting underground water that had fed plaintiff's mill for 60 years, drying it up.
Held: Not liable. Landowner has a right to dig on his own land. Loss without legal injury.
Injuria Sine Damno
Meaning: Legal injury (injuria) without actual damage (damno). A legal right is violated even if no financial/physical loss occurs. These torts are actionable per se (without proof of damage).
Ashby v. White (1703) — King's Bench
Facts: Plaintiff was a qualified voter. Defendant (returning officer) maliciously refused to register his vote. The candidate the plaintiff supported still won.
Held: Defendant liable. CJ Holt: "If a man has a right, he must have a means to vindicate it." Violation of legal right alone is sufficient.
Bhim Singh v. State of J&K (1985) — Supreme Court of India
Facts: MLA Bhim Singh was wrongfully arrested by police, preventing him from attending a crucial assembly session and exercising his constitutional vote.
Held: SC awarded exemplary damages of ₹50,000. Constitutional rights violated = Injuria sine damno. State liable despite no financial harm to plaintiff.
Mental Element in Torts
Malice in Law (Implied)
Wrongful act done intentionally without just cause. Bad intention not needed — merely doing an unlawful act deliberately.
Malice in Fact (Express)
Act motivated by personal ill-will, spite, or evil motive. Essential ingredient in defamation, malicious prosecution & conspiracy.
Motive
Ultimate purpose behind act. Good motive cannot justify unlawful act; bad motive cannot make lawful act tortious.
Negligence
Lack of due care that a reasonable person would exercise. Conduct-based standard — not examining subjective intent.
Recklessness
High degree of negligence — person acts with total indifference to obvious dangerous consequences.
Pata hai khatra hai, fir bhi parwah nahi.
Capacity to Sue & Who Cannot Be Sued
Who Can Sue
- Minor: Can sue through a next friend (legal guardian)
- Lunatic: Can sue through committee or next friend
- Corporation: Can sue for property/business reputation torts
- Alien Friend: Can sue like an ordinary citizen
- Convict: Can sue for torts committed in prison (modern law)
- Married Woman: Can sue independently in her own name
Who Cannot Be Sued / Immunity
- Sovereign/State: Immune for sovereign functions; liable for non-sovereign acts
- Foreign Ambassadors: Protected by diplomatic immunity rules
- Infants/Minors: Cannot be sued if tort is a roundabout way to enforce a contract
- Corporations: Not liable for ultra vires purely personal torts like assault
Strict Liability — Rylands v. Fletcher Rule
Rule (Justice Blackburn): A person who brings, collects, and keeps a dangerous thing on their land for a non-natural use is strictly liable if it escapes and causes damage — even without negligence.
Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) — House of Lords
Facts: Defendant built a reservoir on his land. Engineers negligently failed to block old mine shafts beneath it. Water burst through, flooded plaintiff's coal mines. Defendant himself was not negligent.
Held: Defendant liable. Rule of strict liability applied. Owner is answerable for natural consequences of escape of dangerous things kept for non-natural use.
CONDITIONS FOR RYLANDS v. FLETCHER
Dangerous Thing
Water, gas, electricity, explosives
Escape from Land
Must leave defendant's property boundary
Non-Natural Use
Beyond ordinary use of land; bulk storage
Exceptions (Defences to Strict Liability): (1) Plaintiff's own fault (2) Act of God (3) Act of stranger/third party (4) Consent of plaintiff (Volenti) (5) Statutory Authority
Absolute Liability — M.C. Mehta Rule (India)
Rule: An enterprise engaged in hazardous/inherently dangerous industry owes an absolute, non-delegable duty. No exceptions apply. Compensation is proportional to the size & financial capacity of the enterprise.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India — Oleum Gas Leak Case (1987) — Supreme Court
Facts: Oleum gas leaked from Shriram Food & Fertilizers, Delhi — one death, multiple injuries. PIL filed. Case came shortly after Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1984).
Held: CJ P.N. Bhagwati rejected the old English Strict Liability rule as inadequate for modern industrial India. Established Absolute Liability: jitni badi company, utna bada haryana — no defences available; liability absolute.
Comparison Tables
| Basis | Strict Liability (Rylands v. Fletcher) | Absolute Liability (M.C. Mehta) |
| Origin | English Court, 1868 | Supreme Court of India, 1987 |
| Exceptions | 5 defences available (Act of God, Stranger etc.) | No exceptions; liability is total |
| Nature of Use | Only "non-natural" use of land | Any hazardous/inherent industrial activity |
| Escape Requirement | Dangerous thing must escape property | Escape not required; covers workers inside too |
| Type of Enterprise | Individual landowners, small uses | Large commercial industrial enterprises |
| Compensation Scale | Based on actual damage suffered | Punitive — based on financial size of company |
| Basis | Tort | Crime | Breach of Contract |
| Nature of Wrong | Private wrong against individual | Public wrong against State/Society | Breach of private agreement |
| Duty Imposed By | General Law | Criminal Statutes (BNS) | Consenting parties |
| Primary Remedy | Unliquidated damages | Punishment (Jail or Fine) | Liquidated damages / specific performance |
| Initiation of Case | Injured plaintiff files | State prosecutes | Aggrieved party files |
| Consent Element | Consent is generally a defence | Consent rarely a defence | Consent forms the core |
Important Latin Maxims
Ubi jus ibi remedium Where there is a right, there is a remedy
Damnum sine injuria Damage without legal injury — not actionable
Injuria sine damno Legal injury without damage — actionable per se
Respondeat superior Let the master/principal answer
Qui facit per alium facit per se He who acts through another acts himself