Read Chapter 1 of Drafting of Pleadings And Conveyancing FREE
“Pleading — Principles, Rules & General Procedure”, the complete chapter, exactly as it appears in the full notes.
Free preview · Chapter 117 min read
Chapter 01
PLEADING — PRINCIPLES, RULES & GENERAL PROCEDURE
🔥 PYQ: Golden rules of pleading (6×) · Cause of action (3×) · Non-joinder · Set-off/Counter-claim · Rejoinder — Very Frequent
📋 Previous Year Questions — Chapter 1 (years as per LL.B. Guide)
4M · SHORT
What are material facts? (2019)
Short note: Inconsistent Pleadings (2020)
Short note: Alternative Pleas (2017, 2020)
What is a “Written Statement”?
Explain importance of ‘cause of action’ clause in a plaint (2019, 2022, 2023)
Non-joinder of parties and its effects (2017, 2019, 2023)
Short note: Set-off (2019, 2023) · Distinguish Legal and Equitable Set-off (2018)
Short note: Counter-Claim (2022, 2023)
Short note: Rejoinder (2017, 2022, 2023)
Meaning and purpose of Affidavit (2018, 2025)
Pleading vs Drafting · Return vs Rejection of plaint · Particulars under O.VI R.4 · Striking out pleadings (O.VI R.16)
10–20M · LONG / DRAFT
What are Pleadings? Explain the fundamental rules of pleading (2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023)
Main object of pleading? Golden rules of drafting and pleading (2024)
Define Plaint and give its particulars (2018) · Essential parts of a Plaint (2022, 2024)
How can a Plaint be amended? (2018, 2019)
Grounds on which a Plaint can be rejected (2019)
Distinguish Counter-claim and Set-off (2017, 2020, 2023)
What are Issues and their kinds? How and on what basis are they framed? (2018)
Draft an Affidavit before the Tehsildar for change of residential address (2022)
Rules of pleading + amendment + rejection of plaint — combined 20-marker
Drafting = skilful writing of any legal document (contract, deed, notice, petition, affidavit). Pleading = formal written statements of the parties in a suit — Plaint (plaintiff) and Written Statement (WS) (defendant). O.VI R.1 CPC: “Pleading shall mean plaint or written statement.” Governed by CPC 1908, Orders VI–VIII + case law.
Drafting vs Pleading · Object of Pleading
6 OBJECTS OF PLEADING
1. Define issues
Pinpoint what is admitted / disputed
2. Notice to opponent
No surprise at trial
3. Material facts only
Saves time and cost
4. Fix burden of proof
Who leads evidence first
5. Permanent record
Res judicata later
6. Limit evidence
No evidence beyond pleadings
🧠 Mnemonic — Object of pleading
I · N · M · B · P · E
Issues · Notice · Material facts · Burden · Permanent record · Evidence limit → “Is Neta ne Mujhe Bahut Pareshan kiya, Election me”.
Fundamental / Golden Rules of Pleading (Q1) — 6× PYQ
5 GOLDEN RULES
1. Facts, not law
Plead facts, never conclusions of law (O.VI R.2)
2. Material facts, not evidence
Facta probanda yes · facta probantia no (O.VI R.2(1))
3. Consistency
No departure / contradictory stands (R.7, R.17)
4. Concise, precise, clear
Numbered paras, dates and sums in figures + words (R.2(2),(3))
5. Signed and verified
Party + advocate sign (R.14); verification (R.15)
🧠 Mnemonic — 5 golden rules
F · M · C · C · V
Facts · Material only · Consistent · Concise · Verified → “Fir Mere Client Case Vakalat”.
Term
Meaning
In negligent-driving example
Material facts (facta probanda)
Basic facts the party must prove to establish cause of action / defence — omission can sink the case
“D drove negligently and hit P.”
Particulars
Details supporting material facts — date, place, speed, vehicle no.
Date, time, road, vehicle number
Evidence (facta probantia)
How facts are proved — NOT to be pleaded
CCTV, witness, “was texting” (Guide’s example)
Illustrations (Guide)
“Sandhya made an invalid gift” = conclusion of law ✘. Plead how gift was made, accepted, possession delivered ✔.
“D was negligent” ✘ — plead facts showing duty of care and how it was breached ✔.
Virender Nath Gautam v. Satpal Singh (2007) 3 SCC 617
Held:Material facts = primary facts that must be pleaded (failure to plead even one can dismiss the case); particulars = details, like evidence, supplied at trial. (Guide gives year 2006 — reported 2007; verify.)
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal (1977)
Held: Read the plaint meaningfully; if it shows no real cause of action, reject it at the first hearing — bogus litigation to be nipped in the bud (O.VII R.11).
Other O.VI rules: R.4 particulars for fraud/undue influence etc. · R.5 better particulars · R.7 no departure · R.10 malice/knowledge pleaded generally · R.13 presumptions of law not pleaded · R.16 strike out scandalous/vexatious matter · R.18 amend within 14 days.
⚠ Guide fix: Guide says plaint particulars are in O.VI R.1; correct: O.VII R.1 (O.VI R.1 only defines “pleading”).
🌍 Real-World Example
Zomato order me refund ka case: “Company ne mera refund nahi diya” (conclusion) ✘. Likho: “Order no., date, amount ₹450, app me cancel kiya, refund promise 5 din me, aaj tak nahi aaya” (material facts) ✔. Call recording / screenshot = evidence, baad me.
Inconsistent Pleadings vs Alternative Pleas (2017, 2019, 2020)
Basis
Inconsistent pleading
Alternative plea
Idea
Contradictory facts that cannot coexist (contract both valid and invalid)
Fall-back cases: if the first fails, then the second
Allowed?
No — “departure” (O.VI R.7); only through amendment (R.17) if no prejudice
Yes — if not mutually destructive
Purpose
—
Settle all issues in one suit; avoid second litigation
Example
P pleads D never signed; later pleads D signed under coercion
P seeks specific performance, alternatively damages (SRA s.21). D: “no contract; alternatively, void for want of consideration”
Courts refuse amendment that fundamentally alters the nature of the suit or causes irreparable prejudice.
Plaint = initial pleading by which the plaintiff commences a suit (S.26 CPC; filed in duplicate — O.IV R.1). It states cause of action, material facts and relief. CPC does not define it; meaning drawn from O.VI R.1.
3 PARTS OF A PLAINT
A. Heading & Title
Name of court · parties (name, description, address; minor/unsound mind) · title of suit
B. Body
Numbered paras: facts · cause of action · jurisdiction · valuation · limitation (exemption, O.VII R.6)
C. Relief + Verification
Specific / alternative relief (O.VII R.7) · verification (O.VI R.15) · signature · documents (R.14)
🧠 Mnemonic — O.VII R.1 — nine particulars (a)–(i)
C·P·D·M | C·J·R·S·V
Court · Plaintiff · Defendant · Minor/unsound · Cause of action · Jurisdiction · Relief · Set-off/relinquished · Value (for jurisdiction + court fee).
Other O.VII rules: R.2 — money suits state exact amount · R.3 — immovable property described by boundaries/survey no. · R.7 — relief stated specifically · R.9 — copies for each defendant · R.10 — return to proper court · R.14 — list documents relied on.
Cause of Action — Importance (2019, 2022, 2023)
Cause of action = the bundle of facts which, if traversed, the plaintiff must prove to get judgment — ABC Laminart v. A.P. Agencies (1989). It can arise at several places → concurrent jurisdiction.
Why it is the foundation
Foundation of suit — no cause, no suit; O.II R.2: sue for whole claim from one cause (omitted part barred)
Jurisdiction — S.20(c) CPC: suit where cause arises wholly/partly
Test (Vijay Pratap Singh v. Dukh Haran Nath Singh, 1962)
Assume allegations are true
If they entitle plaintiff to the relief → cause exists
No elaborate enquiry into doubtful facts/law
🧠 Mnemonic — 3 uses of cause of action
F · J · F
Foundation · Jurisdiction · Frivolous-check → “Full Jankari File karo”.
🌍 Real-World Example
Online flipkart-jaisi site se phone nahi aaya (Delhi), seller Bengaluru me: cause of action aadha Delhi (payment/non-delivery) + aadha Bengaluru (seller) — plaintiff apne shehar ke court me suit kar sakta hai (S.20(c)).
Amendment of Pleadings — O.VI R.17 (Q3) — 2018, 2019
O.VI R.17: court may at any stage allow either party to alter/amend pleadings “for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy”. Proviso (2002): after trial has commenced — only if, despite due diligence, matter could not be raised earlier. (Omitted 1999, restored 2002.)Procedure: application + affidavit (with S.151) → court allows on terms → amend within 14 days (R.18) → serve.
✅ Courts ALLOW
Real controversy needs it
Subsequent events
Clerical / formal errors
Additional particulars; extra defences in WS
No prejudice to opponent
⚖
❌ Courts REFUSE
New cause of action / wholly new case
Changes nature of suit
Late afterthought / mala fide / delay
Irreversible prejudice
Changes jurisdiction → plaint returned
Case
Held
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal v. K.K. Modi (2006)
Allowed if needed for real controversy, bona fide, no undue prejudice (also Revajeetu Builders, 2009)
M. Revanna v. Anjanamma (2019)
Suit 1993, amendment 2008 — too late + changes nature → refused
Municipal Corp. of Greater Bombay v. Lala Pancham (1965)
Wholly new cause of action / changed character — not allowed
⚠ Guide fix: Guide lists “withdraw admissions” as a ground. Only ambiguous admissions can be explained; a clear admission cannot be withdrawn by amendment (Panchdeo Narain Srivastava, 1984 — verify).
Rejection of Plaint — O.VII R.11 (Q4) — 2019
R.11
Ground
Example
(a)
No cause of action disclosed
Plaint shows no right infringed
(b)
Relief undervalued, valuation not corrected when directed
₹1 cr property valued ₹10 lakh to save court fee
(c)
Plaint properly valued but insufficiently stamped; court fee not paid in time given
Deficit court fee ignored
(d)
Suit barred by law (limitation, res judicata, statute) — apparent from plaint
Plaint itself shows time-barred
(e)
Not filed in duplicate
—
(f)
Non-compliance with R.9 (copies/process fees)
Curable on court’s order
🧠 Mnemonic — 6 grounds
C · U · S · B · D · R
Cause · Undervalued · Stamp · Barred by law · Duplicate · Rule 9 → “Court Uska Suit Bekar Dekh ke Reject”.
Basis
Rejection (R.11)
Return (R.10)
Ground
Defect in plaint (6 grounds)
Court lacks jurisdiction
Effect
Plaint thrown out — a decree (S.2(2)); appealable
Plaint goes back to be filed in right court
Fresh plaint
Allowed — O.VII R.13 (no bar)
Yes, in proper court
Court looks only at the plaint (and its documents), not the WS — Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003). Can be done at any stage before trial ends. T. Arivandandam (1977) — act early on bogus suits.
Non-joinder of Parties — Order I (Q5) — 2017, 2019, 2023
NECESSARY party
Relief is sought against him
No effective decree can be passed without him
Absence = fatal
⊂
PROPER party
Not indispensable
Effective decree possible, but presence needed for complete and final decision
Court may add him
Effects of non-joinder of NECESSARY party
Suit may be dismissed
No effective decree — decree is a nullity vis-à-vis omitted party
Objection not waived — can be raised even in appeal
e.g. partition suit — all co-sharers needed
Non-joinder of PROPER party
No dismissal
Court may add under O.I R.10(2), at any stage, suo motu or on application
e.g. TM infringement — directors of infringing company
O.I R.9: no suit defeated by misjoinder/non-joinder — except non-joinder of a necessary party. R.10(2) — add/strike parties. R.13 — objection to be taken at earliest (before issues), but this does not save the omission of a necessary party. R.1 and R.3 — joinder of plaintiffs/defendants (same transaction + common question).
Case
Held
Udit Narain Singh v. Board of Revenue (1962)
Licence-cancellation petition — issuing authority and new licensees were necessary parties; petition not maintainable
Razia Begum v. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum (1958)
O.I R.10 — wide discretion to add parties needed for complete adjudication
Test (Kasturi v. Iyyamperumal, 2005): (1) there must be a right to some relief against that party; (2) no effective decree without him — both = necessary.
🌍 Real-World Example
Flat ke dispute me builder pe suit, par us flat par bank ka mortgage hai aur bank ko party nahi banaya — bank ke rights decree se affect honge, isliye bank necessary/proper party.
Written Statement — O.VIII (Q1: “What is WS?”)
WS = defendant’s formal reply to plaint — admissions, denials, additional facts and counter-claim/set-off (O.VIII). Time: 30 days from service of summons (R.1); extendable on reasons recorded up to 90 days (Kailash v. Nanhku, 2005; Salem Advocate Bar Assn., 2005). Commercial suits: 120 days outer limit — right to file forfeited (SCG Contracts v. K.S. Chamankar, 2019).
Rules of denial
R.3 — denial must be specific
R.4 — evasive denial not enough
R.5 — allegation not specifically denied = deemed admitted
R.10 — no WS: court may pronounce judgment against defendant
Practice points
R.1A — file documents relied on with WS
R.9 — later pleadings only with leave
Para-reply words: admitted · denied · partly admitted · matter of record · no knowledge
Set-off (O.VIII R.6): defendant adjusts his money claim against plaintiff’s money claim in the same suit. Counter-claim (R.6A–6G, added 1976): defendant’s independent cross-claim for any cause of action against plaintiff, filed before he delivers defence / time expires; treated as a plaint; plaintiff files WS to it (R.6A(3)); stays alive even if suit is stayed, withdrawn or dismissed (R.6D).
Basis
Legal set-off (R.6)
Equitable set-off
Source
Statutory right of defendant
Common-law equity; not in CPC
Nature
Matter of right
Court’s discretion
Sum
Ascertained sum
Can be unascertained (damages)
Link between claims
Both claims for money, same capacity; recoverable; within pecuniary limits
Same transaction / so closely connected that a separate suit would be unjust
Limitation
Not barred on date of suit
May be barred at WS if not barred when suit filed
Example
A sues B for ₹10,000; B claims ₹4,000 → A recovers ₹6,000
Rent suit; tenant claims loss from landlord’s failure to repair
Basis
Set-off
Counter-claim
Nature
Defensive — reduces/ends plaintiff’s claim
Offensive — separate cross-action
Subject
Money suits only
Any civil claim (injunction, damages, specific performance)
Transaction
Legal: any; equitable: same transaction
Same or different transaction
Amount
Limited to plaintiff’s claim (legal)
Can exceed plaintiff’s claim (within pecuniary jurisdiction)
If suit withdrawn/dismissed
Set-off falls with the suit
Counter-claim survives and is decided
Treated as
Defence
Plaint (separate suit)
🧠 Mnemonic — Set-off vs counter-claim
D · M · S
Defence vs Damage-claim · Money-only vs Many claims · Survival: counter-claim survives → “Defensive set-off, Offensive counter”.
🌍 Real-World Example
A ne B pe ₹50,000 loan recovery suit kiya. B ne WS me A ke khilaaf defamation counter-claim bhi kiya (Guide). A suit wapas le le — tab bhi B ka counter-claim chalta rahega.
Rejoinder = defendant’s reply to plaintiff’s replication. Chain: Plaint → WS → Replication → Rejoinder → Surrejoinder → Rebutter → Surrebutter. O.VIII R.9: no pleading after WS (except defence to set-off/counter-claim) without leave of court — not a matter of right. Guide example: B (minor) pleads void contract → A’s replication: ratified at majority → B’s rejoinder denies ratification.
⚠ Guide fix: One Guide line cites O.VI R.9 for rejoinder; correct: O.VIII R.9 (the Guide’s own example uses O.VIII R.9). Also: limitation for counter-claim runs to the date it is made; for set-off, to the date of suit (Limitation Act s.3(2)).
Issues — Order XIV (Q9) — 2018
Issue = a material proposition of fact or law affirmed by one party and denied by the other (O.XIV R.1). Each material proposition → separate issue. Issues decide the scope of trial and the evidence; burden follows issues.
Kinds of issues (R.1(4))
Issue of fact — “Whether the defendant executed the promissory note?” — proved by evidence
Issue of law — “Whether the suit is barred by limitation?” / “Whether court has jurisdiction?” — no evidence needed
Pure law issue (jurisdiction/bar) may be tried first — R.2 preliminary issue
Bases / materials (R.3 + Guide)
Pleadings — plaint and WS
Examination of parties — O.X (oral clarification: e.g. “signed under coercion”)
Documents produced — e.g. challenge to genuineness of sale deed
Not on guesswork — only record
Procedure (R.1(5)): read pleadings → examine parties (O.X) → hear pleaders → pick material propositions → frame + record one issue each. Court may amend/add/strike issues before decree (R.5).
🧠 Mnemonic — Sources of issues
P · E · D
Pleadings · Examination of parties · Documents → “Ped (tree) pe issues ugte hain”.
Makhan Lal Bangal v. Manas Bhunia (2001)
Held: Framing issues fixes the path of the trial; evidence on controversies not covered by pleadings and issues cannot be admitted.
Affidavit = written statement of facts, sworn/affirmed by the deponent before a person authorised to administer oath (Magistrate, Notary, Oath Commissioner). Law: S.139 + O.XIX CPC, Oaths Act 1969. Matters limited to deponent’s personal knowledge (O.XIX R.3) — belief allowed only in interlocutory matters with grounds stated.
Uses
Proof of facts — O.XIX R.1 (esp. interlocutory)
Evidence-in-chief — O.XVIII R.4; cross-examination still allowed
False statement in declaration — BNS 236 (IPC 199)
Court may order cross-examination of deponent (O.XIX R.2)
Draft skeleton — Affidavit (change of address, before Tehsildar / Notary / Executive Magistrate)
1
Heading + deponent“AFFIDAVIT” — I, Arun Sharma, s/o …, aged 40, r/o …, do hereby solemnly affirm and state:
2
Numbered paras1 old address · 2 new address · 3 permanent, residing since (date) · 4 purpose · 5 true to best of knowledge
3
AnnexuresAadhaar/Voter ID (old), Aadhaar + rent agreement (new)
4
DEPONENTSignature
5
Verification“Verified at Delhi on 15 Sept 2025 that paras 1–5 are true to my personal knowledge”
6
AttestationSign + seal — Tehsildar / Notary / Executive Magistrate
🌍 Real-World Example
Aadhaar me address badalna / passport / bank KYC ke liye self-declaration affidavit — wahi Guide wala draft.
🎨 Visual Pack — Pleading Diagrams, Flowchart & More Examples
📊 Diagram — Pleadings chain — kaun kab file karta hai
Guide: only plaint + WS are “pleadings” (O.VI R.1). Replication / rejoinder = subsequent pleadings — only with the court’s leave (O.VIII R.9), except defence to set-off / counter-claim.
📊 Diagram — Set-off vs Counter-claim (Venn)
Dono me defendant apni claim usi suit me uthata hai — par set-off ek dhaal hai, counter-claim ek talwaar.
Is relief properly valued? (or corrected when directed)
No →
Reject — R.11(b)
No ▼
Is it on sufficient stamp / court fee? (time given)
No →
Reject — R.11(c)
No ▼
Is suit barred by law — apparent from plaint?
Yes →
Reject — R.11(d)
No ▼
Filed in duplicate + R.9 compliance?
No →
Reject — R.11(e)/(f)
No ▼
All fine → plaint admitted, summons issued
🌍 Real-World Example
Ola refund case: Customer ne Ola par suit kiya — “₹500 zyada charge hua”. Ola ke WS me: “surge pricing T&C me tha”. Issues bante hain: (1) kya customer ne T&C accept kiye? (2) kya fare rate-card ke mutabik tha? Pleadings se hi issues bane — isliye pleading ek blueprint hai.
🌍 Real-World Example
Set-off: Dukandaar ne customer par ₹10,000 maal ka suit kiya; customer bolta hai “tumne meri ₹4,000 ki repair ka paisa nahi diya” → set-off, dukandaar sirf ₹6,000 paayega. Amendment: plaint me “interest” likhna bhool gaye → allowed; par rent suit ko title suit bana do → refused (naya case).
Bachhaj Nahar v. Nilima Mandal (2008) — SC
Facts: relief claimed on a case not pleaded. Held: no evidence can be considered on a plea not in the pleadings; the court cannot make out a case for a party. Principle: decision confined to pleaded questions.
Verification of corporation pleading (Guide): by Secretary / Director / principal officer able to depose to the facts (O.XXIX R.1). False verification is punishable (BNS 229/236 — see Affidavit).
🧠 Mnemonic — WS timelines
30 · 90 · 120
“Tees din me jawab, nabbe tak extension, sau-bees par commercial suit ka darwaza band.”
🧠 Mnemonic — Amendment — allow vs refuse
R · S · C · A | N · C · L · P
Allow: Real controversy · Subsequent events · Clerical · Additional particulars. Refuse: New cause · Changes nature · Late/mala fide · Prejudice.
About the Drafting of Pleadings And Conveyancing paper and these notes.
What do the Drafting of Pleadings and Conveyancing notes cover?
The notes cover the principles of pleading under Orders VI to VIII CPC, civil drafts such as notice, plaint, written statement and promissory note, interlocutory applications, execution petitions and appeals, matrimonial petitions, writ petitions, criminal drafts such as complaint and bail application, and conveyancing: sale, gift, lease and mortgage deeds, will, codicil and power of attorney.
What is the difference between drafting and pleading?
Drafting is the skilful writing of any legal document such as a deed, notice, petition or affidavit. Pleading means the formal written statements of the parties in a suit: under Order VI Rule 1 CPC a pleading is a plaint or a written statement.
Conveyancing — Basics, Components of Deed, Attestation, Registration
5 topics
Deeds in Conveyancing — At a Glance
Essential Components of a Deed
Attestation
Registration · Stamp Duty — Quick Table
Escrow
08
Transfer Deeds — Sale · Gift · Lease · Mortgage · Foreclosure
6 topics
Sale Deed — TPA s.54
Gift Deed — TPA ss.122–129
Lease Deed — TPA ss.105–117
Mortgage — TPA s.58
Mortgage Deed Essentials
Foreclosure — TPA s.67
09
Will · Codicil · Power of Attorney
4 topics
Will — Essentials
Codicil
Drafting a Will
General Power of Attorney
A plaint is the pleading by which the plaintiff starts a suit. The notes take the particulars required by Order VII Rule 1 CPC, such as the court, the parties, the facts constituting the cause of action, jurisdiction, valuation and the relief claimed, and also cover amendment of pleadings and rejection of a plaint.
Is a format for a writ petition included?
Yes. The notes compare Article 32 and Article 226, explain the five writs, and give the format for drafting a writ petition under Article 226.
What are the essentials of a valid will?
The notes explain the essentials of a will, how it is attested, how a codicil alters or adds to a will, and give a model will. They also cover the general power of attorney, and the sale, gift, lease and mortgage deeds under the Transfer of Property Act.
